US (470) 948-0356 India +91 70321 51545

Cybersecurity

Enterprise vulnerability management

The scanner is the easy part. A working program decides who owns each asset, which findings matter, how work reaches engineers, what happens when a patch cannot be applied, and how anyone knows it is improving.

The problem this service solves

Programs usually fail in the same places. Asset inventory is incomplete, so nobody knows whom to ask. Everything is "critical," so nothing is. Tickets land in a queue that the owning team never sees. Exceptions are granted informally and never reviewed. Metrics count findings opened and closed, which rewards closing the easy ones.

We fix those joints, not the scanner. The work usually starts with a short review of what exists, then covers prioritization rules, ownership mapping and integration with the systems your engineers already use.

What is in scope

  • Current-state review

    Interview stakeholders, review scan coverage, ticket flow and a sample of aged findings.

  • Asset and ownership model

    Define how assets are grouped, who owns them and how ownership stays current.

  • Prioritization policy

    Rules combining severity, known exploitation, exposure, asset importance and compensating controls.

  • Service levels

    Realistic remediation targets by priority, agreed with the teams who must meet them.

  • Workflow and ticketing

    Integrate with ServiceNow, Jira or similar so findings reach the right queue with the right context.

  • Exception handling

    A documented process for risk acceptance with expiry dates and review.

  • Metrics

    A small set of measures: exposure time for exploited vulnerabilities, coverage, aging, repeat findings.

How the work runs

Assess

Establish the starting point.

  1. 1

    Interviews and data review

    Talk to the people who patch and the people who report. Look at real tickets.

  2. 2

    Gap analysis

    List where findings stall and why.

Design

Agree how it should work.

  1. 3

    Policy and prioritization model

    Draft the rules and test them against your last scan data.

  2. 4

    Workflow design

    Map the path from finding to fix, including exceptions.

Implement

Make it run.

  1. 5

    Tool configuration

    Tune scans, dashboards and integrations.

  2. 6

    Pilot

    Run with one or two teams, adjust, then expand.

  3. 7

    Handover

    Train program owners, document procedures and leave a metrics baseline.

What you receive

  • Current-state assessment
  • Prioritization policy and decision tree
  • Ownership model and asset grouping
  • Remediation service levels agreed with owning teams
  • Ticketing integration and templates
  • Exception process
  • Metrics dashboard specification
  • Runbooks

Tooling and technique

Scanning platforms

  • Tenable
  • Qualys
  • Rapid7

Workflow

  • ServiceNow
  • Jira

Data sources

  • CISA KEV
  • FIRST EPSS
  • NVD
  • CMDB

Tool categories describe how we work. They are not a claim of vendor partnership or certification.

Standards we map to

Frameworks and references

  • NIST CSF 2.0
  • CIS Controls v8
  • NIST SP 800-40 Rev 4
  • CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01 (as a reference for KEV-based remediation)

Mapping findings to a framework is not the same as certification against it.

Before we start

What we need from you

  • Access to scan platform and recent exports
  • Introductions to asset owners and patching teams
  • The ticketing system used by operations
  • Existing policies and exception records

What this service is not

  • Patching itself (that remains with your operations teams, though we can supply engineers)
  • A scanner purchase recommendation without a review of your needs

What changes afterwards

  • Exploited vulnerabilities on exposed assets get fixed first, and quickly
  • Teams receive fewer, better tickets
  • Exceptions expire and get reviewed
  • Leadership sees trends that reflect real exposure

Questions people ask

What remediation timelines should we set?

Timelines should reflect priority and what the owning team can sustain. A common starting point is days for known-exploited, internet-facing issues and longer windows for the rest, adjusted after a pilot. Your regulator or customers may set minimums.

Can you run the program for us?

We help you build it and train your team. If you need ongoing operation, we can discuss a scoped arrangement or supply experienced security engineers through our staffing practice.

How do we handle systems we cannot patch?

Document the reason, apply compensating controls such as segmentation or virtual patching, set an expiry date and review it. We build that process into the program.

Related